The perpetrators have been identified as Vishwajeet Gond (aka Vikki Gond) and Manish Paswan (aka Prince), both of whom are under the age of twenty. According to Atul Anjan Tripathi, the Assistant Commissioner of Police for Cantt, these implicated individuals reside in the same neighbourhood. He added that a case has been lodged against them both under the pertinent sections of the Indian Penal Code (IPC).

According to the police report, Bhailal, a retired NTPC engineer, resides in the Chandmari neighbourhood VDA colony, which falls under the jurisdiction of the Shivpur police station. Sunday afternoon, two young males rang his doorbell. As Bhailal exited and opened the door, the adolescents announced their desire to speak with him. However, they entered quickly and closed the door behind themselves.

Then, at knifepoint, they held his 2-year-old niece and his daughter-in-law as hostages. They threatened to kill the two people and asked for 10 lakh in exchange. Because of all the noise, Bhailal sounded the alarm and called for help. His neighbours called the cops right away. Senior police officers arrived at the scene quickly, and a large police force was sent to the area.

Atul Anjan Tripathi started talking to the people who had taken his son. With hard work, the police were able to open the door and catch both thieves. The young girl and her mother were saved from a dangerous situation. Tripathi hurt his hands when he tried to take down the two kidnappers during the fight.

Ashok Mutha Jain, the Commissioner of Police, said that the police team’s work would be rewarded with 50,000 and that the team that saved the mother and daughter should get a DG police recognition disc.

ALSO READ : At least 21 civilians were killed in an attack in central Mali.

The police team had many people on it, including Additional Commissioner of (Law and Order) Shivasimpi Channappa, Deputy Commissioner of Police for Varuna Zone Amit Kumar, ADCP for Varuna Zone Manish Kumar Shandilya, ACP Atul Anjan Tripathi, Inspector SOG Sunil Singh, and Station Officer Shivpur Vaidyanath Singh. The people in the area thanked the cops for how quickly they came and how well they handled the situation.

The post In Varanasi, a 2-year-old girl and her mother were saved from thieves. appeared first on Republic Aeon.

Many abused people blame themselves because they accept at face value the abuser’s assertion that they brought it on.

In order to break free from an abusive partner, victims must first change their beliefs about who they are and how their abuser used them.

Whether the abuse is verbal, emotional, or physical, breaking apart from such a relationship can be challenging. Leaving an abusive partner is challenging for many reasons.3,8 The following are just a few potential roadblocks that could be encountered.

Cyclical Abuse

It’s common for abusive relationships to repeat themselves. Sometimes there is little to no abuse, and then all of a sudden it becomes severe. When the victim’s tolerance for the abuse has reached its limit, they may resolve to end the relationship the very following day.

But there’s a solid reason they don’t usually follow through on their word. After acting out in particularly violent ways, the abuser usually goes into hiding for a period and shows signs of compassion for the abused partner.2,6

It doesn’t matter how many times a survivor of abuse has gone through this cycle, they will always hold out hope that this time things will be different. This is especially true if the abuser is hiding and acting nice towards them. They may remember the happy days in the relationship more vividly than the bad ones.

Feelings of Responsibility

Victims of abuse often internalise blame because they believe their abuser’s frequent assertions that they were to blame for the violence.2,4 The victim may interpret the repetition of abusive relationships as confirmation that they are to blame for the relationship’s difficulties and that they trigger and deserve the violence. Why else do so many of their relationships degenerate into abuse?

A Pattern of Abusive Relationships

violence victims often face relational violence in every relationship they’ve ever been in, but it’s not because they deserve it or provoke it. The true explanation is that they have a number of personality traits that abusers know they may use to their advantage. As an example, a person who has been abused may have innately high levels of trust, loyalty, giving, kindness, subservience, selfishness, forgiveness, passivity, conflict avoidance, and optimism.

Addicts are naturally drawn to partners with character flaws that are easy to exploit since they “get off” on abusing others.1,2 Not only are they pros at finding and tracking down their “prey,” but they also have the added bonuses of being superficially charming and overconfident, both of which help them capture their “prey” and turn them into dependents.

Because of these qualities, those who are more vulnerable to abuse are much more likely to form connections with abusive people who are out for their own benefit.

Financial Dependence and Fear

Victims of domestic violence frequently rely on their abuser for financial support. They run the risk of being unable to support themselves financially, of losing custody of their children (if they have any), and of putting their own and their loved ones’ safety in jeopardy if they leave, as abusers who are forsaken by their spouses may seek vengeance. Leaving an abusive partner might already be difficult, but these factors can make it considerably more so.9,10

Abuse Victims Who Manage to Leave

Despite the difficulty, many victims are able to leave their violent spouses, and some are even able to stop the cycle of abusive relationships.

It’s not hard to picture the weight lifted off their shoulders once they are finally able to escape their abuser. Sadly, people may experience a range of bad and damaging emotions alongside any sense of relief. Many years after fleeing an abusive relationship, PTSD affects the majority of abuse survivors.

New Research on Pre- and Post-Abuse Perceptions

Psychologists Amandine Dziewa and Fabienne Glowacz (2022) interviewed 21 abuse victims of both sexes to determine if there were any consistent themes in their experiences as they planned and ultimately fled violent relationships.4

The study’s subjects were more inclined to leave an abusive partner after experiencing a profound shift in their understanding of themselves, their partner, and the nature of their relationship. In order to break free from an abusive partner, victims must first alter their conceptions of who they are, who their partner is, and what kind of relationship they are in.5,7

Also Read: Afghanistan’s 5.8 magnitude earthquake shakes Delhi-NCR, Jammu & Kashmir.

Extrinsic factors can hasten the process of leaving. For instance, if the abuser suddenly escalates the violence, it can cause the victim to flee the relationship out of sheer shock and anguish.

Self-Restructuring

Self-restructuring, or an identity shift, is essential for those who have been the victims of abusive relationships to break free from them for good.5,6,7 The first step in healing from the effects of relationship violence is acknowledging and accepting one’s identity as a victim.

Victims of abuse often need the assistance of professionals and the understanding of their loved ones before they can accept that they are victims of abuse. Victims of abuse can only accept themselves as such if they come to terms with the fact that they did nothing to bring about the abuse and bear no responsibility for it.2,4,5

Victims of abuse can break the cycle of abuse only if they reframe their understanding of who they are and how they relate to their abusers.5,7

Changing the victim’s subjective understanding of their “self,” their partner’s true nature, and the abusive nature of their relationship may be necessary for them to realise the root of their relationship woes and finally decide to end their toxic relationship for good.

The post What Does It Take to Get Out of an Abusive Relationship? appeared first on Republic Aeon.

Physical, sexual, and/or psychological aggressiveness in romantic and sexual relationships between adolescents (ages 11-18) is known as adolescent dating violence. Understanding dating violence is crucial for parents, teachers, and other adults who work with young people.

Researchers in the field of avoiding dating violence like ourselves were curious as to whether or not such legislation existed in Canada. Our research shows that we are not doing enough to ensure the safety of young people in romantic relationships.

Prevalence and outcomes

One in three Canadian teens have been victims of dating violence. However, adults are not inclined to talk to their children about dating violence. In fact, most individuals don’t expect dating violence to be so widespread.

The prevalence of dating violence is far lower than the prevalence of other topics that families are more willing to discuss. Substance abuse in the home is often discussed, yet fewer teens are affected by alcohol and cigarette use than by dating violence. One-quarter of Canadian teens report binge drinking within the prior 12 months. Only 20% say they haven’t used an e-cigarette in the last month.

We surveyed more than 3,000 Canadian teens to get a representative sample size for our analysis of dating violence data. Twelve percent of those we surveyed reported being physically injured on purpose by a romantic partner or casual acquaintance in the preceding year. Eighteen percent of those in relationships have had a date use social media in an abusive way. In addition, 28% said their partners had attempted to control them or cause them emotional harm.

Teen dating violence is a widespread occurrence in Canada, according to a study conducted in Québec. Twenty percent of the women and seven percent of the men in the survey reported experiencing unwanted sexual activity in their current or most recent romantic partner. A sizable proportion of young individuals are also victims of stalking by a partner in a romantic or sexual relationship. Two out of every three stalking victims in Canada are female, with the majority (50%) falling between the ages of 15 and 34.

Dating violence, like many other public health issues, disproportionately impacts marginalised youth, such as trans and non-binary adolescents, low-income youth, and youth of colour.

Our team’s study shows that young people who have experienced dating violence are more likely to report mental health issues in the future. Teen dating violence is a major predictor of adult intimate partner violence. Dating violence can, in extreme cases, result in death.

The role of policy in prevention

The deleterious effects of dating violence can be mitigated with early intervention. However, many teens report major obstacles to getting help after experiencing dating violence.

Educators and other influential people often struggle to know what to do in the face of relationship violence. We attribute this to adults’ general lack of familiarity with dating violence policy, despite its critical importance in outlining their responses to such incidents.

The continuing COVID-19 pandemic demonstrates the importance of policy in addressing public health issues. However, the importance of legislation in avoiding dating violence is often overlooked.

It might be difficult to make sense of the many dating violence policies that exist across Canada’s provinces and territories. As the scientific co-directors of Canada’s healthy relationships hub PREVNet, we are frequently questioned by teachers about how they should approach the issue of dating violence in their classrooms. Both adults in charge of children and teens and the young people themselves may wonder what they can do to help if they learn of dating violence.

Dating violence policy map

Our team at PREVNet developed a bilingual (French and English) interactive policy map to provide easy-to-understand information on dating violence policies in each Canadian province and territory for educators, carers, and young people. When it comes to helping young people who have experienced dating violence, our map is particularly useful for educators.

For young people in Canada who have experienced dating violence, our map is a crucial first step in cataloguing accessible policy protections. However, our research also shows that while there are many policies for abused children and some for abused adults, absolutely no policy exists solely for young people who have been victims of relationship violence.

Protection orders, for instance, are typically unavailable to minors. In addition, there are no publicly sponsored resources (such as hotlines) in Canada that are specifically geared towards helping young people who have experienced dating violence. The policies now in place do not spell out how people should help these children and adolescents.

This road map shows us exactly where to go to help young people who have experienced relationship violence. There is a pressing need for federal and provincial policy that targets dating violence to be developed with input from young people. Adults’ responsibilities and roles in dealing with dating violence should be made clear under this policy. In addition, it needs to offer developmental services to help young people.

The rights and well-being of young people can be bolstered through the creation and execution of such policy.

The post What is Adolescent dating violence? appeared first on Republic Aeon.

ALSO READ : ‘Eroded strategic trust’: Ajit Doval to Chinese diplomat on LAC standoff

This opinion was voiced during the three-day Ranchi demonstration. Prem Shahi Munda, president of the Adivasi Jan Parishad, said in an interview with The Indian Express that the violence in Manipur, particularly the sexual assault of women, has made mankind ashamed. He questioned the “silence” of Amit Shah, the Union Home Minister, and Prime Minister Narendra Modi. It appears to be a carefully thought-out conspiracy, he claimed.

In order to inform people of the “anti-Adivasi nature and policies” of the BJP government, the Parishad plans to travel to various villages, starting with those in the Tamar and Bundu areas, according to Munda. “What we are witnessing in Manipur is a very hazardous situation. It appears that those in positions of power have come to terms with the fact that there is no rule of law in Manipur. Every caste and group should get together to combat the politics of divisiveness, votes, and silence.

Despite the Parishad’s political agnosticism, Munda stated that he had no objections to “any political party joining the cause.” Leaders of the Jharkhand Mukti Morcha, the Congress, the Rashtriya Janata Dal, and the Communist Party of India have also expressed their displeasure with how the Central government has handled the violence in Manipur over the past few days.

Dayamani Barla, the founder of Adivasi Moolvaasi Astitva Rakhsa Adhikaar Manch, said in an interview with The Indian Express that people could “very clearly” observe what was occurring in Manipur. Barla has spent the last 30 years advocating for tribal rights in Jharkhand.

Manipur raises a number of political, socioeconomic, and human rights issues. Why aren’t the Prime Minister or the Minister of the Interior even attempting to put out the fire? Why hasn’t a committee been established to look into the violence as part of an investigation? The Home Minister would also be aware that FIRs had been filed, so why was nothing done? Why was it kept quiet? Barla enquired.

“As of today, my understanding is that everything in Manipur is about controlling power and resources, and that violence has been tolerated,” she continued. The Centre discusses both protecting tribal groups on the one hand and expanding women’s rights through a uniform civil code on the other. Events that are occurring concurrently in Manipur and other locations stem from a politics of hatred. Where is the respect for women and tribal people?

Convener of the Adivasi Women’s Network Elina Horo, who participated in the demonstration, stated that there may be a great deal more instances of this kind in Manipur. “Politics of majoritarianism for power and money have taken precedence over efforts to curtail crime. The patriarchal worldview that causes people to view women as a commodity is also reflected in the sexual assault against women, according to her.

When asked why there is so little political discussion of sexual violence against women in Jharkhand, Horo responded, “This is a major point, and patriarchal thinking is one of the primary reasons. Jharkhand too exhibits conduct akin to khap panchayats. As a society, we can take immediate action to stop the crime, but we also need to plan for the long term by investing in education and working with groups like religious organisations to address the problem.

The post At Jharkhand protest against Manipur violence, Adivasi outfits decry ‘politics of silence, polarisation’ appeared first on Republic Aeon.