'AI should not be viewed as threat, but as.': What Supreme Court judge said
in ,

‘AI should not be viewed as threat, but as.’: What Supreme Court judge said

The COVID-19 pandemic’s peak and beyond would not stop the wheels of justice from turning, Supreme Court judge Hima Kohli remarked .

What Supreme Court judge said

According to Supreme Court judge Hima Kohli, artificial intelligence (AI) should not be seen as a threat but rather as a chance to improve the standard of legal practise because technology has significantly contributed to keeping the legal system functioning, even at the height of the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond.

The employment of AI in the legal industry, however, may raise ethical questions about “accountability, transparency, and protection of parties’ rights,” according to Justice Kohli.

“It is crucial that we are conscious of the ethical issues associated with the employment of artificial intelligence in courts as we embrace technology. Concerns concerning accountability, transparency, and party rights protection are brought up by the usage of AI. Establishing clear rules and procedures would be essential to ensuring that justice is served to all parties fairly “At an event hosted by the ICICI bank in this city, the judge from the Supreme Court stated.

Speaking on the subject of “Artificial Intelligence and the Legal Sector,” Justice Kohli claimed that using AI in the legal industry has changed the game and has the potential to completely transform how lawyers practise.

“The legal community has certain reservations about the development of artificial intelligence. Lawyers could worry that technology will replace their knowledge and abilities. For the following reasons, AI should not be seen as a danger but rather as a chance to improve the standard of legal practise instead: “She spoke.

First off, the judge noted that AI has the potential to significantly increase the efficiency of legal practise by automating repetitive operations, cutting down on the time needed for legal research, and offering real-time access to information.

According to her, this might provide attorneys more time and room to concentrate on challenging and valuable duties, improving client outcomes overall.

“Second, AI systems have the capacity to analyse enormous volumes of data and spot patterns and connections that people would not notice right away. Better outcomes for clients and enhanced decision-making precision are the results “said Justice Kohli.

Thirdly, AI can be utilised to offer clients personalised advice, immediate access to information, and virtual legal representation. According to Justice Kohli, it enhances clients’ overall experiences and fosters the development of long-lasting connections.

Lastly, she continued, the incorporation of AI into the legal industry has the potential to open up new economic opportunities, including the creation of new legal-tech goods and services.

It is undeniable that technology has played a significant role in keeping the wheels of justice turning during the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond, Justice Kohli said, adding that “the role of AI is bound to expand in shaping the legal world and bring about positive changes” in the coming years.

Even while Justice Kohli emphasised the necessity of using AI in the legal sector, she warned that the technology would lack human empathy, compassion, and reasoning, which are crucial for the administration of justice and would instead require judges.

“A judge’s responsibility extends beyond the dry application of the law and includes a wide range of legal and personal experience when they first take the bench. She is capable of weighing the evidence in a case, comprehending how people behave, and applying the law to the situation in order to make a fair and reasonable conclusion. Despite its technological advancement, AI lacks human empathy, compassion, and reasoning, which are necessary for the administration of justice “She spoke.

According to Justice Kohli, the function of judges in an Indian judiciary powered by AI is likely to alter and adapt. However, their essential responsibility in guaranteeing fairness, impartiality, and the protection of civil liberties would stay consistent and unchangeable.

“Even if AI has the potential to significantly increase the effectiveness of the legal system, it will never be able to replace a human decision-maker. In order to maintain the values of justice and preserve the rights of litigants, judges will continue to play a crucial role “She spoke.

Also Read: | Japan’s Squid Game Style Reality TV Show ‘Tortured’ Man For 15 Months

Since artificial intelligence (AI) is a creation of mankind, the supreme court justice stated that there are “no limitations to growth because there are no bounds to human knowledge and imagination.”

“In the end, AI will never be able to take the place of human values, which are firmly established in national constitutions, elite academic institutions, and institutions of government and civil society. Let’s embrace technology and artificial intelligence, but with caution and a firm commitment to the rule of law, “She spoke.

An information-sharing tool called “i-Amicus” was developed by the ICICI bank’s legal department to assist its customers in resolving banking issues.

 

 

Written by Pawan Kumar

Pawan is blogger and writer, he has been writing for several top news channels since a decade. His blogs & notions have quality contents.

Japan's Squid Game Style Reality TV Show 'Tortured' Man For 15 Months

Japan’s Squid Game Style Reality TV Show ‘Tortured’ Man For 15 Months

Truck Driver, Who Won Rs 1 Crore Lottery, Caught Stealing Shoes Worth Rs 16 Lakh

Truck Driver, Who Won Rs 1 Crore Lottery, Caught Stealing Shoes Worth Rs 16 Lakh